(TITY) .8
to def BOT
hfuo duR 69 NHGno. erte
-8000.00 T jete od "Hatto not bangre on DVA"
**
at ort gure utger
A Benfon ade nutturer Froo ans*¶
ร
5 & eru, to
or bo-
et bree Vaunuo +
R
* Da
0.
QUE I botworoo at a07: 7:00
ma bratte of no,bach af sy sa prANG””
**O TOTO
**
* QHMAYOn
to moltoford a rot
**te-
V boxin.h
.soitert tet: ok
प
bP Y.
Enclosure 2. (IX.)
sir,
Charibers,
Supreme Court, Hongkong,
(undated.)
451
I am glad to learn from Your Excellency's
letter of 26th. June (received on 28th. at 3.30 P.M.), which I
have the honour to acknowledge, that Your Excellency has decided
to acquiesce in ay suggestion to send a cable to the Secretary
of State with reference to the inclusion of the papers relating
to the Chamber of Commerce dignute in those recently forwarded
to the Secretary of State in connection with another matter. The
draft cahle annexed to "our Excellency's letter under reply
will I have no doubt be sufficient for the purpose, though I
should naturally prefer to leave the wording of it to Your
Excellency's judgment.
2.
I regret to find that Your Excellency main-
-tains the view already expressed that the letter I wrote to
the "China Mail" contravened the Colonial Regulations.
I have the honour to point out that although
the correspondence in the Press is alluded to in the post-script
of Your Excellency's letter dated 22nd. February, but despatched
about a fortnight later there is no suggestion that such was
Your Excellency's opinion.
I have further the honour to point out that
Your Excellency has never been in presence of all the facts
connected with the question; nor, although it would appear from
the post-script above referred to, and the letter of the
Secretary of the Chamber of 29th. February (enclosed in the
above letter) that the Committee of the Chanther were invited to
express a further opinion on the matter, was I requested at any
time to supply Your Excellency with any information. Had Your
Excellency
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.